Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > [CCing Jakub, Greg and the regressions list] > > On 19.04.23 06:54, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@xxxxxxx> writes: >> >>>>> Anyway, cf the bugzilla > > [FWIW, it's this ticket Toke meant: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217286 ] > >>>>> this was a pretty bad regression for 6.2, so >>>>> would be good to move this along reasonably quickly (although I guess we >>>>> just missed the -net PR for rc7)... >>>> >>>> I'm not planning to send anymore stuff to v6.3 so my plan is to take >>>> this to -next. The merge window is very close anyway so this shouldn't >>>> cause too much delay. >>> >>> Hmm, okay, a bit unfortunate that we'll ship 6.3 with the same bug >> >> Yeah, it is unfortunate. > > Agreed. > >> But it is always a question of time :) To save >> time I usually try to send two wireless tree pull requests per cycle, >> one early in the cycle and the second around the middle. > > Why not ask Linus to pull this directly from the list then? He doesn't > mind doing that for an occasional regression fix. And then he can decide > himself if the change is worth the risk -- and obviously can take into > account if he'll release and rc8 or not. I'm OK with doing it that way; I'll do so later tonight unless Kalle or Jakub complains before then... -Toke
