On 4/18/2023 4:15 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Mon, 2023-04-17 at 22:07 +0800, Wen Gong wrote:
OK. So I will try to put this in mac80211 layer, is it OK?
I guess? I'm still not really sure why you even want it, but hey, that's
up to you in a way. I really didn't like the suggestion with
wiphy_iftype_ext_capab (or any other capability for that matter), it
feels like it should be more dynamic, like maybe a new "add link"
callback or something? At least then you can't blame mac80211 for when
it breaks when you have two 5 GHz links ...
ok, so I would like to add callback such as
"add_link(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif vif, struct
ieee80211_bss_conf *link_conf, unsigned int link_id)"
in struct ieee80211_ops, and mac80211 call it in
ieee80211_mgd_setup_link()/ieee80211_vif_update_links,
then lower-drvier could dynamic set the local addr of assoc
link_conf(also for 2nd link_conf), is it OK?
johannes
