Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > Downside of course is that there's quite a lot of boilerplate code but I >> > still consider that positives outweight the negatives. Thoughts? >> > >> > And I'll emphasise that this is not a blocker for anything but it would >> > be nice to clean this up both in rtw88 and rtw89 at some point, if we >> > can. > > Since they will be a lot of works and I have a lot of local patches on > hand, can I apply these rules to the patches and submit them ahead? > Until all things or a bunch of conversion are completed (maybe weeks or > one or two months later), I can submit patches that only convert > these H2C/C2H with new rules. > > Does it work to you? Yes, that's totally fine. No rush with this cleanup. Thanks for working on this. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
