On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Sorry, my fault, this was a direct result of >>>> 60c7e22196fb4230b76db1f5fb283e811b8f3fb3 "ath5k: honor [...] > OK Vasanth confirmed this is correct, and ath9k actually has incorrect > behavior so we have to fix that there as well. If stable got the ath5k > changes to the filter then yes we should push it there too. Heh, yeah I thought the hardware was doing magic on our behalf too; I guess I should've asked about ath9k rather than assume it was right and ath5k was wrong. I don't think the change got submitted for stable and it only went for rc3 a day or two ago. John, can you revert 60c7e22196fb4230b76db1f5fb283e811b8f3fb3 or take Luis' patch which effectively does the same? -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html