(Trimmed CC list) Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>, and, since >> 63266a653589e1a237527479f10212ea77ce7844 "ath5k: rates cleanup", we do not fall back to the basic rate, such packets would trigger >> the following WARN_ON: > > So its slow because using rate 0 takes a while? If indeed you don't > see a valid use for this rate I'd say to completely disallow it and > use BUG_ON() on it. Please, avoid BUG_ON() at all costs, only use it if the situation might mean major data corruption or something similar. For users BUG_ON() is a major grief because there are no visible indication what has happened. IMHO wireless drivers should not have BUG_ON() calls at all, WARN_ON() is enough and much more usable for everyone. -- Kalle Valo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
