From: Ching-Te Ku <ku920601@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Correct pointer assignment of v1 null data report. It doesn't really
change logic at all, but it looks more readable.
Signed-off-by: Ching-Te Ku <ku920601@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
index 436d5e35ae49b..0ca621a9f80a1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
@@ -1065,7 +1065,7 @@ static u32 _chk_btc_report(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
case BTC_RPT_TYPE_NULLSTA:
pcinfo = &pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_nullsta.cinfo;
if (ver->fcxnullsta == 1) {
- pfinfo = &pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_nullsta.finfo;
+ pfinfo = &pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_nullsta.finfo.v1;
pcinfo->req_len = sizeof(pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_nullsta.finfo.v1);
} else if (ver->fcxnullsta == 2) {
pfinfo = &pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_nullsta.finfo.v2;
--
2.25.1
