On Mon, Feb 27, 2023, at 21:15, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 02:34:51PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> I don't expect this to be a problem normal laptop support, as the last >> PC models that predate Cardbus support (e.g. 1997 ThinkPad 380ED) are >> all limited to i586MMX CPUs and 80MB of RAM. This is barely enough to >> boot Tiny Core Linux but not a regular distro. > > Am I understanding that the argument you're putting forward here is > "cardbus started in year X, so from year X we can ignore 16-bit > PCMCIA support" ? Right, but I'm asking this as a question, hence the 'RFC' in the subject. > Given that PCMCIA support has been present in x86 hardware at least > up to 2010, I don't see how that is any basis for making a decision > about 16-bit PCMCIA support. I assume you mean machines with Cardbus slots that can use 16-bit PCMCIA slots, rather than laptops with only PCMCIA here, right? > Isn't the relevant factor here whether 16-bit PCMCIA cards are still > in use on hardware that can run a modern distro? (And yes, x86 > machines that have 16-bit PCMCIA can still run Debian Stable today.) There are three combinations that are supported at the moment: 1. Machines with only 16-bit PCMCIA support, all very old, which rely on these slots for basic functionality. 2. Machines that support Cardbus slots that are actually used to connect 16-bit cards. 3. Machines that have a Cardbus slot and can just use 32-bit cards for whatever they need. Dominik originally raised the question whether we could kill off all PCMCIA support already given its age, which would either break all three of the above or at least the first two if Yenta-socket is kept as a PCI hotplug driver. I wanted to make sure that we keep both case 1) for sa1100/omap1/pxa and case 3) for x86, while case 2) seems much less important because there are presumably fewer users than 3), and they have an upgrade path that only involves replacing one cheap card instead of trashing the whole machine. Arnd
