Hi Lee, On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 12:00 AM Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote: > > > Hi Lee, > > > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 7:16 AM Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 24 Jan 2023, patchwork-bot+bluetooth@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > > > Hello: > > > > > > > > This patch was applied to bluetooth/bluetooth-next.git (master) > > > > by Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > > > > > > On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 11:47:27 +0100 you wrote: > > > > > Add the missing trigger patterns for Bluetooth and WLAN activity, which > > > > > are already in active use. > > > > > > > > > > While at it, move the mmc pattern comment where it belongs, and restore > > > > > alphabetical sort order. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > Here is the summary with links: > > > > - [v2] dt-bindings: leds: Document Bluetooth and WLAN triggers > > > > https://git.kernel.org/bluetooth/bluetooth-next/c/ef017002b93b > > > > > > Why are you taking LED patches through the Bluetooth tree? > > > > I assume there isn't a tree dedicated to dt-bindings/leds > > % ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.yaml > Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> (maintainer:LED SUBSYSTEM,in file) > Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:LED SUBSYSTEM) > Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS) > Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS) > Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@xxxxxxxxx> (in file) > linux-leds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list:LED SUBSYSTEM) > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS) > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list) Well this doesn't tell us what parts of the dt_bindings have a dedicated tree and which doesn't, anyway this doesn't show linux-bluetooth so I wonder why people are CCing it. > > not to mention this was submitted to linux-bluetooth and nobody else > > other than Rob reviewed it, > > To: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>, Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx>, > Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>, > Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>, > Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-leds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, > linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-bluetooth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, > linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, > Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>, > Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > anyway I'd be happy if the dt-bindings patches > > would be handled elsewhere. > > Yep, we got this. :) So if it starts with dt-binding: prefix shall we ignore? Or is just for dt-bindings: leds? Or perhaps we can just ignore patches received as CC: rather than directly To: field. > > -- > Lee Jones [李琼斯] -- Luiz Augusto von Dentz
