Due to the polling tick is 10ms, the wake up flow in the status waiting would cause more 10~20ms than the real HW response time. Reduce tick-interval from 10ms to 1ms to get better network performance, such as ping latency, in low power mode. Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Deren Wu <deren.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/pci_mcu.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/pci_mcu.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/pci_mcu.c index 86340d3205c5..288caa728afc 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/pci_mcu.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/pci_mcu.c @@ -69,8 +69,8 @@ int __mt7921e_mcu_drv_pmctrl(struct mt7921_dev *dev) for (i = 0; i < MT7921_DRV_OWN_RETRY_COUNT; i++) { mt76_wr(dev, MT_CONN_ON_LPCTL, PCIE_LPCR_HOST_CLR_OWN); - if (mt76_poll_msec(dev, MT_CONN_ON_LPCTL, - PCIE_LPCR_HOST_OWN_SYNC, 0, 50)) + if (mt76_poll_msec_tick(dev, MT_CONN_ON_LPCTL, + PCIE_LPCR_HOST_OWN_SYNC, 0, 50, 1)) break; } @@ -110,8 +110,8 @@ int mt7921e_mcu_fw_pmctrl(struct mt7921_dev *dev) for (i = 0; i < MT7921_DRV_OWN_RETRY_COUNT; i++) { mt76_wr(dev, MT_CONN_ON_LPCTL, PCIE_LPCR_HOST_SET_OWN); - if (mt76_poll_msec(dev, MT_CONN_ON_LPCTL, - PCIE_LPCR_HOST_OWN_SYNC, 4, 50)) + if (mt76_poll_msec_tick(dev, MT_CONN_ON_LPCTL, + PCIE_LPCR_HOST_OWN_SYNC, 4, 50, 1)) break; } -- 2.18.0