Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 09:58:02AM CET, jiapeng.chong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >The assignment of the else and else if branches is the same, so the else >if here is redundant, so we remove it and add a comment to make the code >here readable. > >./drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c:8927:9-11: WARNING: possible condition with no effect (if == else). > >Link: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=3631 >Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >--- > drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c >index 12b700c7b9c3..36b9cd4dd138 100644 >--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c >+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c >@@ -8924,9 +8924,7 @@ static void rt2800_rxiq_calibration(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev) > > if (i < 2 && (bbptemp & 0x800000)) > result = (bbptemp & 0xffffff) - 0x1000000; >- else if (i == 4) >- result = bbptemp; >- else >+ else /* This branch contains if(i==4) */ I don't see how this comment is useful. Better to remove. One way or another: Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxx> > result = bbptemp; > > if (i == 0) >-- >2.20.1.7.g153144c >
