Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH v2] wifi: ath9k: hif_usb: clean up skbs if ath9k_hif_usb_rx_stream() fails

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Hmm, so in the other error cases (if SKB allocation fails), we just
> 'goto err' and call the receive handler for the packets already in
> skb_pool. Why can't we do the same here?

If SKB allocation fails, then the packets already in skb_pool should be
processed by htc rx handler, yes. About the other two cases: if pkt_tag or
pkt_len is invalid, then the whole SKB is considered invalid and dropped.
That is what the statistics macros tell. So I think we should not process
packets from skb_pool which are associated with a dropped SKB. And so just
free them instead.

> Also, I think there's another bug in that function, which this change
> will make worse? Specifically, in the start of that function,
> hif_dev->remain_skb is moved to skb_pool[0], but not cleared from
> hif_dev itself. So if we then hit the invalid check and free it, the
> next time the function is called, we'll get the same remain_skb pointer,
> which has now been freed.

Sorry, I missed that somehow.
Moving 'hif_dev->rx_remain_len = index - MAX_RX_BUF_SIZE;' after
"ath9k_htc: RX memory allocation error\n" error path should be done, too.
hif_dev->rx_remain_len is zeroed after remain_skb processing, so we cannot
reference hif_dev->remain_skb unless we explicitly allocate successfully a
new one (making rx_remain_len non zero).

> So I think we'll need to clear out hif_dev->remain_skb after moving it
> to skb_pool. Care to add that as well?

Yes, this must be done. I'll add it to patch v3.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux