> I think he's proposing we special-case Apple chips into their own > firmware table just to avoid colliding with non-Apple firmware usage, > which is honestly kind of tempting as the safe option if nobody from the > Broadcom/Cypress side is willing to clarify what, exactly, is the > relationship between these chips and what their respective revision > numbers are so we can *correctly* represent them and avoid further > confusion and problems down the line. Exactly > > You might be able to help with that ;) I am sending the patch. > > - Hector
