2008/10/22 Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wednesday 22 October 2008, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> Initialise correctly last fields, so tasks can be actually executed.
>> On some architectures the initial jiffies value is not zero, so later
>> all rfkill incorrectly decides that rfkill_*.last is in future.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> net/rfkill/rfkill-input.c | 5 +++++
>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/rfkill/rfkill-input.c b/net/rfkill/rfkill-input.c
>> index e5b6955..cd93f48 100644
>> --- a/net/rfkill/rfkill-input.c
>> +++ b/net/rfkill/rfkill-input.c
>> @@ -255,6 +255,11 @@ static struct input_handler rfkill_handler = {
>>
>> static int __init rfkill_handler_init(void)
>> {
>> + unsigned long last_run = jiffies - msecs_to_jiffies(500);
>> + rfkill_wlan.last = last_run;
>> + rfkill_bt.last = last_run;
>> + rfkill_uwb.last = last_run;
>> + rfkill_wimax.last = last_run;
>> return input_register_handler(&rfkill_handler);
>> }
>
> I believe Dmitry Torokhov recently moved the rfkill structures for wlan, bt, etc
> into an array which allowed for easy looping through all structures. That would
> make updating all entries easier (and less prone to errors when a new structure
> is added).
I can't find the patch in question. Could you please point me to it?
>
> Could you rebase thise patch on top of that one?
> Thanks,
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
