On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 6:48 PM Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2022-09-23 at 10:55 +0900, Jaewan Kim wrote:
> >
> > +++ b/info.c
> > @@ -741,6 +741,9 @@ broken_combination:
> > pat->max_pattern_len, pat->max_pkt_offset, rule->max_delay);
> > }
> >
> > + if (tb_msg[NL80211_ATTR_PEER_MEASUREMENTS])
> > + print_pmsr_capabilities(tb_msg[NL80211_ATTR_PEER_MEASUREMENTS]);
> > +
> > if (tb_msg[NL80211_ATTR_MAX_AP_ASSOC_STA])
> > printf("\tMaximum associated stations in AP mode: %u\n",
> > nla_get_u16(tb_msg[NL80211_ATTR_MAX_AP_ASSOC_STA]));
> > diff --git a/iw.h b/iw.h
> > index e712c59..0707cb4 100644
> > --- a/iw.h
> > +++ b/iw.h
> > @@ -221,6 +221,7 @@ void print_vht_info(__u32 capa, const __u8 *mcs);
> > void print_he_capability(const uint8_t *ie, int len);
> > void print_he_info(struct nlattr *nl_iftype);
> > void print_eht_info(struct nlattr *nl_iftype, int band);
> > +void print_pmsr_capabilities(const struct nlattr *pmsr_capa);
>
> Also, FWIW, it would probably make sense to make this static and put it
> into info.c at least while it's not used elsewhere?
>
> johannes
My apologies. I made a mistake when moving changes from the Android repo.
Could you take another look at the patch? It would be a great help.
--
Jaewan Kim (김재완) | Software Engineer in Google Korea |
jaewan@xxxxxxxxxx | +82-10-2781-5078
