On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 17:56 +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote: > In addition iwlwifi HW release TX packets in order to mac80211 i.e. no > need to maintain the transition window > so simple flag maybe shell revert the flow into regular tx response > flow in mac80211. > Only rate scaling is aware that the packets were transmitted > aggregated, we did some hacking there around this it should be cleaned > up. I wonder how we're going to pass them down to the driver anyway. And how about rate control, is that really done per sub-frame? Does that make any sense? I'm thinking that if we pass a fraglist down for the ampdu, then we should have the fraglist in tx status too, in one go... If rate control is per subframe maybe it just needs to be made aware to walk the fraglist? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
