Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, 2022-10-05 at 16:43 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: >> > > >> > > This logic has implications for putting "urgent" frames (like PS(?)) on >> > > TXQs as well, of course, but that needs to be handled somehow anyway... >> > >> > But that probably then anyway needs to be handled in next_txq()? >> >> Yeah, just meant that comment as an "for future reference", it doesn't >> impact this patch series (I think?) >> > > Right now, no, but with the promised patch to make powersave use TXQs it > would, I think :) Yup, hence why I wanted to give this "head's up" in advance so everyone is aware :) -Toke
