Using mdelay() can work well, but calibration causes too much time. Use proper udelay() to get shorter time and the same result. Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c_rfk.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c_rfk.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c_rfk.c index 1e67a565a9e0c..b0672b906e7bc 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c_rfk.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c_rfk.c @@ -1666,7 +1666,7 @@ static u8 _dpk_one_shot(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, enum rtw89_phy_idx phy, ret = read_poll_timeout_atomic(rtw89_phy_read32_mask, val, val == 0x55, 10, 20000, false, rtwdev, 0xbff8, MASKBYTE0); - mdelay(10); + udelay(10); rtw89_phy_write32_clr(rtwdev, R_NCTL_N1, MASKBYTE0); rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK, -- 2.25.1
