cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx writes: > From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx> > > The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer. > > That's now the recommended way to copy NUL terminated strings. > > Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/fw.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/fw.c > index 1ab09e1c9ec5..4c1aecd1163c 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/fw.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/fw.c > @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static void carl9170_fw_info(struct ar9170 *ar) > CARL9170FW_GET_MONTH(fw_date), > CARL9170FW_GET_DAY(fw_date)); > > - strlcpy(ar->hw->wiphy->fw_version, motd_desc->release, > + strscpy(ar->hw->wiphy->fw_version, motd_desc->release, > sizeof(ar->hw->wiphy->fw_version)); Already changed in: https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/bf99f11df4de Please use latest trees to avoid duplicate work. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
