On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 15:10:36 -0700 Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote: > Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 23:50:18 +0200 Johannes Berg wrote: > >> Anyone have recommendations what we should do? > > > > Likely lack of sleep or intelligence on my side but I could not grok > > from the email what the stacking is, and what the goal is. > > > > Are you putting taprio inside mac80211, or leaving it at the netdev > > layer but taking the fq/codel out? > > My read was that they want to do something with taprio with wireless > devices and were hit by the current limitation that taprio only supports > multiqueue interfaces. > > The fq/codel part is that, as far as I know, there's already a fq/codel > implementation inside mac80211. > > The stacking seems to be that packets would be scheduled by taprio and > then by the scheduler inside mac80211 (fq/codel based?). Doesn't adding another layer of non-time-aware queuing after taprio completely defeat its purpose? Perhaps I'm revealing my lack of understanding too much..
