On Wed, 2022-07-27 at 16:01 -0700, greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > mac80211 stack will only report tx-status for skb claiming to be > ampdu heads, so lie a bit in mt7915 and set the flag so that mac80211 > will record status for each skb. > > mt7915 appears to report retry status on an individual per-skb > manner, > so that method above seems to work. > > Re-constitute the txinfo status rate info so that the rix and flags > is also at least close to correct. No direct way to report HE > rates that way, so mac80211 might could use some tweaking in > the ieee80211_tx_status_ext to take both info and status->rate > into account. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mac80211.c | 4 + > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76.h | 5 + > .../net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/init.c | 1 + > .../net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/mac.c | 95 > ++++++++++++++++++- > .../net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/mac.h | 6 +- > .../net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/main.c | 4 + > .../net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/main.c | 4 + > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c | 18 +++- > 8 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) Hi Ben, Looks like we have a similar goal but I don't use txs_for_no_skb. What about directly switching to PPDU bases reporting (it should include MPDUs total/failed/retries counts/bytes) and using .sta_statistics? I think this might simplify the codes and can use mac80211 ethtool as is. I made these changes for .net_fill_forward_path (WED) cases. We're doing some throughput tests. https://pastebin.com/raw/qCzNNDzw https://pastebin.com/raw/25Vsk2xs Ryder