Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 09:32:20AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: >> >> But just so that I understand correctly, after Herbert's patch no ath9k >> changes is needed anymore? That sounds great. > > No a small change is still needed in ath9k to completely fix > the problem, basically a one-liner. Either I could split that > out and give it to you once the core bits land in mainline, or > we could just do it in one patch with your ack. > > The chances of conflicts are remote. It's a lot easier to handle that in a single patch via your tree. So please do CC Toke and linux-wireless when you submit your patch so that we can then ack it. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
