On Tue, 2022-07-12 at 02:17 +0300, Viktor Barna wrote: > On Thu, 26 May 2022 21:54:36 +0200, johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > that makes it sound like these are firmware things and should be endian > > safe? > > Yes, it should, thanks! PS: can you, please, clarify whether it is ok to reply > with “ACK” for all comments, those does not imply anything special in response? > Just to show, that we saw the comment and will take it into account. Or …is it > enough to mention that in RFCv3 changelist? We are grateful for the review! > >From my POV, it's sufficient to list in the version changelog "addressed comments from <person>" or so, not like in gerrit where you have to mark as "ack"/"done" for each comment :-) Of course if there's something where you disagree or want to solve it in another way, it's probably easier to continue the discussion with that comment instead. johannes
