On Fri, 2022-07-01 at 11:59 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > So was skeptical on having a higher cache size(like 250 or 500 max). > > Hence had a value of 50 and left the configuration part for devices > > which needed higher > > cache. > > But as you mentioned, this is only runtime max memory and not default. > > So we should be fine to set some high limit, If above is not a > > concern could we stick to > > an upper limit of ~150-200 ? > > Right, I'm fine with that. I was just throwing out 500 as a random > number to show that it's not really a huge memory requirement. > But maybe Felix wants to comment? Felix? johannes
