Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> From: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> If a chip is configured to support mac80211 chanctx ops, we avoid
> using older FW that does not support HW scan to make mac80211 stack
> handle scanning as expected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
> index 0e12629f789c3..a47451dc9d81d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
> @@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ static void rtw89_fw_recognize_features(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
>
> int rtw89_fw_recognize(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
> {
> + const struct rtw89_chip_info *chip = rtwdev->chip;
> int ret;
>
> ret = __rtw89_fw_recognize(rtwdev, RTW89_FW_NORMAL);
> @@ -261,6 +262,13 @@ int rtw89_fw_recognize(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
>
> rtw89_fw_recognize_features(rtwdev);
>
> + if (chip->support_chanctx_num != 0 &&
> + !RTW89_CHK_FW_FEATURE(SCAN_OFFLOAD, &rtwdev->fw)) {
> + rtw89_err(rtwdev,
> + "require newer FW to support HW scan for chanctx\n");
> + return -ENOENT;
> + }
So if the user has not update the firmware a kernel upgrade will break
their internet? That's not good, we should not break existing setups. So
what firmware version is required?
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
