On Thu, 2022-05-19 at 18:07 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx> > > There's some pretty close code here, with the exception > of RCU dereference vs. protected dereference. Refactor > this to just return a pointer and then do the deref in > the caller later. > Or maybe I shouldn't do the double pointering but rather use RCU accessors that can do both (with rcu_dereference_check()) ... johannes
