Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH] mac80211: Use full queue selection code for control port tx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 07.05.22 13:26, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Alexander Wetzel <alexander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>>> Calling only __ieee80211_select_queue() for control port TX exposes
>>> drivers which do not support QoS to non-zero values in
>>> skb->queue_mapping and even can assign not available queues to
>>> info->hw_queue.
>>> This can cause issues for drivers like we did e.g. see in
>>> '746285cf81dc ("rtl818x: Prevent using not initialized queues")'.
>>>
>>> This also prevents a redundant call to __ieee80211_select_queue() when
>>> using control port TX with iTXQ (pull path).
>>> And it starts to prioritize 802.11 preauthentication frames
>>> (ETH_P_PREAUTH) on all TX paths.
>>>
>>> Pierre Asselin confirmed that this patch indeed prevents crashing his
>>> system without '746285cf81dc ("rtl818x: Prevent using not initialized
>>> queues")'.
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Pierre Asselin <pa@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Wetzel <alexander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Starting to prioritize ETH_P_PREAUTH was just added since I noticed that
>>> contradictory to at least my expectations control port does accept
>>> ETH_P_PREAUTH but handles these like a normal frame for the priority.
>>> That can be broken out or even drop, when needed.
>>>
>>> While looking at the code I also tripped over multiple other questions
>>> and I'll probably propose a much more invasive change how to handle
>>> the queue assignment. (End2end we seem to do some quite stupid things.)
>>>
>>> Additionally I really don't get why we call skb_get_hash() on queue
>>> assignment:
>>> I found the commit '180ac48ee62f ("mac80211: calculate skb hash early
>>> when using itxq")' but don't see why calculating the hash early is
>>> useful. Any hints here are appreciated. fq_flow_idx() seems to do that
>>> when needed and I can't find any other usage of the hash...
>> 
>> The commit message of that commit has a hint:
>> 
>>      This avoids flow separation issues when using software encryption.
>> 
>> The idea being that the packet contents can change on encryption, but
>> skb->hash is preserved, so you want it to run before encryption happens
>> to keep flows in the same queue.
>> 
>> However, AFAICT ieee80211_tx_h_encrypt() is called after frames are
>> dequeued from the TXQs, so not actually sure this is needed. Adding
>> Felix, in the hope that he can explain the reasoning behind that
>> commit :)
> Sorry, I don't remember the details on that one. One advantage that I
> can think of (which isn't mentioned in the commit msg) is that it is
> likely better for performance to calculate the hash early since there
> is a good chance that more of the skb data is still in the CPU cache.

Right, that could be, I suppose. I don't think it'll hurt, at least;
Alexander, did you have any particular reason for wanting to get rid of
it?

-Toke




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux