Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH v2] cw1200: fix incorrect check to determine if no element is found in list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cw1200: fix incorrect check to determine if no element is found in list
From: Xiaomeng Tong <xiam0nd.tong@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 17:21:39 +0800
Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuba@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx, pizza@xxxxxxxxxxxx, xiam0nd.tong@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <164977147986.6629.2901483762629864309.kvalo@kernel.org>
References: <164977147986.6629.2901483762629864309.kvalo@kernel.org>

On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 13:51:21 +0000, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Failed to apply, please rebase on top of latest wireless-next.

I have sent a PATCH v3 rebased on latest wireless-next as you suggested, please check it.
Thank you very much.

--
Xiaomeng Tong

References:
- Re: [PATCH v2] cw1200: fix incorrect check to determine if no element is found in list
  - From: Kalle Valo

Prev by Date: [PATCH net] mac80211: tx: delete a redundant if statement in ieee80211_check_fast_xmit()
Next by Date: [PATCH] wl18xx: debugfs: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] cw1200: fix incorrect check to determine if no element is found in list
Next by thread: [PATCH] ath9k: initialize arrays at compile time
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Host AP] [ATH6KL] [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network] [Linux Bluetooth] [Wireless Regulations] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Linux Kernel] [IDE] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Hiking] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID]

Powered by Linux