Search Linux Wireless

Re: [RFC PATCH] iwlwifi: iwl-dbg: Use del_timer_sync() before freeing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Luca,

On 4/7/22 22:20, Coelho, Luciano wrote:
On Thu, 2022-04-07 at 12:50 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Hi,

On 4/6/22 08:34, Guenter Roeck wrote:
In Chrome OS, a large number of crashes is observed due to corrupted timer
lists. Steven Rostedt pointed out that this usually happens when a timer
is freed while still active, and that the problem is often triggered
by code calling del_timer() instead of del_timer_sync() just before
freeing.

Steven also identified the iwlwifi driver as one of the possible culprits
since it does exactly that.

Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Shahar S Matityahu <shahar.s.matityahu@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 60e8abd9d3e91 ("iwlwifi: dbg_ini: add periodic trigger new API support")
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
RFC:
      Maybe there was a reason to use del_timer() instead of del_timer_sync().
      Also, I am not sure if the change is sufficient since I don't see any
      obvious locking that would prevent timers from being added and then
      modified in iwl_dbg_tlv_set_periodic_trigs() while being removed in
      iwl_dbg_tlv_del_timers().


I prepared a new version of this patch, introducing a mutex to protect changes
to periodic_trig_list. I'd like to get some feedback before sending it out,
though, so I'll wait until next week before sending it.

If you have any feedback/thoughts/comments, please let me know.

Hi Guenter,

Thanks for your proposal!

I recently moved from the Intel WiFi team to the Graphics team, so I'm
adding Gregory, who has taken over my duties, to the discussion.

I don't recall any specific reasons for using del_timer() instead of
del_timer_sync() here.  So your patch does look correct to me.


Thanks a lot for the feedback. I spent some time trying to determine
if a mutex to protect the periodic timer list is needed, but concluded
that it is not necessary because the code adding the timer list and
the code removing it are never executed in parallel. Of course,
I may be missing something, so I'd be happy to be corrected.

Thanks,
Guenter



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux