Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Sat, 2022-04-02 at 14:27 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>
>> @@ -2591,12 +2602,6 @@ static void ath_tx_rc_status(struct ath_softc *sc, struct ath_buf *bf,
>> hw->max_rate_tries;
>> }
>>
>> - for (i = tx_rateindex + 1; i < hw->max_rates; i++) {
>
> might want to drop that blank line too :)
>
>> - tx_info->status.rates[i].count = 0;
>> - tx_info->status.rates[i].idx = -1;
>> - }
>> -
>> - tx_info->status.rates[tx_rateindex].count = ts->ts_longretry + 1;
>> }
>
> since there's nothing else.
Hmm, fair point; Kalle, I don't suppose I could trouble you for a fixup
when committing? :)
-Toke
