Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> (apologies for top-posting) >> When you submit new patches you should not do so as a reply, but >> instead as a new thread with a new version number. >> >> And since multiple folks have suggested that you submit on a >> per-subsystem basis I suggest that you re-send this as a singleton >> just to wcn36xx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> along with the associated maintainers. >> >> So I believe [PATCH v3] wcn36xx:... would be the correct subject, but >> I'm sure Kalle will let us know otherwise > > You are correct. Also I strongly recommend using git send-email instead > of Mozilla. Patch handling is automated using patchwork and git, so > submitting patches manually is error prone. Yeah, our patchwork didn't even detect this patch. But v3 is visible and is on my queue: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20220328212912.283393-1-benni@xxxxxxxxxx/ -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
