On 3/28/22 00:47, Kalle Valo wrote:
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:35:14PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 01:50:15PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare
having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure.
Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these
cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should
no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2]
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.16/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/78
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi all,
Friendly ping: can someone take this, please?
...I can take this in my -next tree in the meantime.
Like we have discussed before, please don't take any wireless patches to
your tree. The conflicts just cause more work of us.
Sure thing. I just removed it from my tree.
I didn't get any reply from wireless people in more than a month, and
that's why I temporarily took it in my tree so it doesn't get lost. :)
I assigned this patch to me on patchwork and I'm planning to take it to
wireless-next once it opens. Luca, ack?
Awesome.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
