On Wednesday 15 October 2008, Dave wrote: > John W. Linville wrote: > > Here is a nice little batch of wireless fixes in time for 2.6.28-rc1. > > There are also a few USB ID additions as well. I think this is all > > mostly obvious, and hopefully still acceptable at this stage. > > > > Please let me know if there are problems! > > > Andrey Borzenkov (1): > > orinoco: fix unsafe locking in orinoco_cs_resume > > Hi John, > > Just wanted to check whether you'd seen/intend to apply the orinoco patch Andrey posted in <http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122365972026045&w=4>. It fixes a regression (vs 2.6.26) when using 4k stacks. > well ... this is not a regression actually as the bug is triggered by new code that was added in 2.6.28. Still it is valid bug fix for new code in 2.6.28 and IMHO quite appropriate. We better add it earlier so it gets more testing. Personally I think that two other patches should go in as well. They have low regression potential (they apply to new code only; existing functionality is not touched); and they make downloadable FW (and hence WPA) more usable. > Or whether you'd prefer that patch resent with an updated subject? > Me too?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
