On 2/23/2022 11:46 AM, Veerendranath Jakkam wrote:
In contrast, NL80211_IFTYPE_MLO_LINK can't be used to represent AP MLO link since an MLD AP must support pre-11be and 11be clients simultaneously so each AP MLO link affiliated with AP MLD must also act as independent AP for pre-11be clients so each AP MLO link must be
Not just for pre-11be clients. 11be clients can opt-out right?
represented by NL80211_IFTYPE_AP associated with a separate netdev. Two link AP MLD representation: AP MLD (netdev + wdev) / \ / \ wlan0 wlan1 IFTYPE_AP IFTYPE_AP (netdev + wdev) (netdev + wdev) | | | | radio(2G) radio(5G)
So the AP MLD is a new IFTYPE? Earlier discussions were suggesting the AP MLO links would be bridged, but then there would be only a netdev at AP MLD level, right?
Regards, Arend
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature