On 2/21/2022 2:49 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
Manikanta Pubbisetty <quic_mpubbise@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On 1/28/2022 5:43 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
Manikanta Pubbisetty <quic_mpubbise@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Unlike other ATH11K PCIe devices which are enumerated by APSS
processor (Application Processor SubSystem), WCN6750 gets
enumerated by the WPSS Q6 processor (Wireless Processor SubSystem);
In simple terms, though WCN6750 is PCIe device, it is not attached
to the APSS processor, APSS will not know of such a device being
present in the system and therefore WCN6750 will be registered as
a platform device to the kernel core like other supported AHB
devices.
WCN6750 uses both AHB and PCI APIs for it's operation, it uses
AHB APIs for device probe/boot and PCI APIs for device setup
and register accesses; Because of this nature, it is referred
as a hybrid bus device.
Refactor PCI code to support hybrid bus devices like WCN6750.
Tested-on: WCN6750 hw1.0 AHB WLAN.MSL.1.0.1-00573-QCAMSLSWPLZ-1
Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-01720.1-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-1
Tested-on: QCN9074 hw1.0 PCI WLAN.HK.2.5.0.1-01100-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
Tested-on: IPQ8074 hw2.0 AHB WLAN.HK.2.4.0.1-00192-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
Signed-off-by: Manikanta Pubbisetty <quic_mpubbise@xxxxxxxxxxx>
[...]
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/pci_cmn.c
[...]
+static inline void ath11k_pci_select_window(struct ath11k_pci *ab_pci, u32 offset)
+{
+ struct ath11k_base *ab = ab_pci->ab;
+
+ u32 window = FIELD_GET(ATH11K_PCI_WINDOW_VALUE_MASK, offset);
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&ab_pci->window_lock);
+
+ if (window != ab_pci->register_window) {
+ iowrite32(ATH11K_PCI_WINDOW_ENABLE_BIT | window,
+ ab->mem + ATH11K_PCI_WINDOW_REG_ADDRESS);
+ ioread32(ab->mem + ATH11K_PCI_WINDOW_REG_ADDRESS);
+ ab_pci->register_window = window;
+ }
+}
So the style used in ath11k is ath11k_<filename>_foo, so that a function
ath11k_pci_foo() should be in pci.c. This patch is now breaking that
style. Maybe pci_cmn.c should renamed to cpci.c, pcic.c or something
like that? Then the function prefix could be ath11k_cpci_, ath11k_pcic_
or similar.
Makes sense, pcic.c and ath11k_pcic_* looks better, I'll make these changes.
Of course another possiblity, which I forgot to mention in my previous
email, is to keep pci_cmn.c filename but rename the functions to
ath11k_pci_cmn_foo(). Though don't know which one is better.
I was contemplating on having ath11k_pci_cmn_* for a very long time; In
fact, in the patches which I worked on had the pci_cmn prefix for all
the APIs, I felt the prefix is long and dropped the idea :)
At least to me, pcic.c and ath11k_pcic* looked good.
