>Da: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx> >Inviato: venerdì 18 febbraio 2022 15:04 >A: Greg Kroah-Hartman; Riccardo Ferrazzo >Cc: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kalle Valo; devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; David S . Miller >Oggetto: Re: [PATCH] staging: wfx: fix scan with WFM200 and WW regulation > >Hello Riccardo, > > >On Friday 18 February 2022 14:53:35 CET Riccardo Ferrazzo wrote: >> >> Signed-off-by: Riccardo Ferrazzo <rferrazzo@xxxxxxxx> >> >> >> Sorry for the footer it is added automatically >> > >Your mail has probably not been received by everyone since you sent it >in html[1] (try also to avoid top-posting). > >Nevertheless, Greg, is it sufficient for you? > >[1]: https://urlsand.esvalabs.com/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fuseplaintext.email%2F&e=09733f94&h=1ec5571e&f=y&p=n > >> On Friday 18 February 2022 12:00:54 CET Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> > On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 11:57:47AM +0100, Jérôme Pouiller wrote: >> > > On Friday 18 February 2022 11:53:58 CET Jerome Pouiller wrote: >> > > Riccardo Ferrazzo R&D Software Designer rferrazzo@xxxxxxxx CAME S.p.A. > From: Riccardo Ferrazzo <rferrazzo@xxxxxxxx> >> > > > >> > > > Some variants of the WF200 disallow active scan on channel 12 and 13. >> > > > For these parts, the channels 12 and 13 are marked IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR. >> > > > >> > > > However, the beacon hint procedure was removing the flag >> > > > IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR from channels where a BSS is discovered. This was >> > > > making subsequent scans to fail because the driver was trying active >> > > > scans on prohibited channels. >> > > > >> > > > Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > > >> > > I forgot to mention I have reviewed on this patch: >> > > >> > > Reviewed-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > Reviwed-by is implied with signed-off-by. >> > >> > But what happened to the signed-off-by from the author of this change? >> >> The author hasn't used format-patch to transmit this patch. >> >> Riccardo, can you reply to this mail with the mention "Signed-off-by: >> Your name <your-mail@xxxxxxx>"? It certifies that you wrote it or >> otherwise have the right to pass it on as an open-source patch[1]. >> >> >> [1] https://urlsand.esvalabs.com/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.kernel.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fv4.17%2Fprocess%2Fsubmitting-patches.html%23sign-your-work-the-developer-s-certificate-of-origin&e=09733f94&h=e09f2efa&f=y&p=n<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://urlsand.esvalabs.com/?u=https*3A*2F*2Fwww.kernel.org*2Fdoc*2Fhtml*2Fv4.17*2Fprocess*2Fsubmitting-patches.html*23sign-your-work-the-developer-s-certificate-of-origin&e=09733f94&h=e09f2efa&f=y&p=n__;JSUlJSUlJSUl!!N30Cs7Jr!GRgB_JlhZF2XzaDEB1ZDnSbLiMmD8XdrmC_uqyLoczR5e05vvMlDCgyKlEu3XyI3PdJK$> >> >> Thank you, >> >> -- >> Jérôme Pouiller >> >> >> > >-- >Jérôme Pouiller Might look better now Signed-off-by: Riccardo Ferrazzo <rferrazzo@xxxxxxxx>
