Hi--
On 2/13/22 09:20, trix@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Remove the second 'info'.
ack
> Replacements
> 'adventages' with 'advantages'
ack
> 'strenth' with 'strength'
ack
> 'atleast' with 'at least'
ack
> 'thr'u'' with 'through'
ack, or even "thru" is acceptable.
> 'capabilty' with 'capability'
ack
> 'controll' with 'control'
ack
> 'ourself' with 'our self'
I don't think so.
> 'noone' with 'no one'
ack
More below:
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon.c | 2 +-
> drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/bcma/driver_pci_host.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/bcma/main.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/bcma/sprom.c | 4 ++--
> 5 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon.c b/drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon.c
> index 62f5bfa5065d..fd91a39f02c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon.c
> +++ b/drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon.c
> diff --git a/drivers/bcma/main.c b/drivers/bcma/main.c
> index 8e7ca3e4c8c4..bf6efe3caf68 100644
> --- a/drivers/bcma/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/bcma/main.c
> @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static int bcma_register_devices(struct bcma_bus *bus)
> int err;
>
> list_for_each_entry(core, &bus->cores, list) {
> - /* We support that cores ourself */
> + /* We support that cores our self */
I would s/cores/core/.
