On Tuesday 14 October 2008 01:05:51 Pavel Roskin wrote: > On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 18:55 -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 00:55 +0200, Christian Lamparter wrote: > > > > I don't get that on i386. But the values don't seem to be corrupted > > > by > > > > byte-swapping. > > > > > > > Hmm, this should be impossible since: > > > "p54: report appropriate rate and band values for 802.11a" > > > 5f840304b5f7dff0028407fa9b284aecb85a94aa > > > > I see. It's recent code, so maybe it wasn't broken yet when I was > > testing it on i386. > > > > This code in drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54common.c sets rate_idx: > > > > rx_status.rate_idx = (dev->conf.channel->band == IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ ? > > hdr->rate : (hdr->rate - 4)) & 0xf; > > > > printk() shows: > > > > dev->conf.channel->band = 1, hdr->rate = 0, rx_status.rate_idx = 12 > > And if I set rx_status.rate_idx to 0, I still get that badness for the > same reason (status->rate_idx = 12, sband->n_bitrates = 8). Also, there > is another badness reported sometimes: > hmm, strange... so dev->conf.channel->band = 1 (=> IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ) Ok, but why are there only 8 rates? It should be twelve for 2.4GHz Band! (What Card/MAC & RF-Chip have you got? Indigo/Duette/Firsbee or XBow?) Regards, Chr -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
