On Thu, 2022-02-10 at 12:54 -0600, Larry Finger wrote: > > I am most concerned about that bss_entries_limit=1 option for cfg80211. Do you > still get the warnings logged if you eliminate that one? Yeah that's probably the reason ... I guess we should ignore it if it's too low to make any sense. > I also have a question for Johannes, et al. Should the "if (WARN_ON(!oldest))" > in net/wireless/scan.c be a WARN_ON_ONCE()? It does not seem worthwhile to spam > the logs. It is clear that once this happens, it will happen again and again. > Indeed, that seems reasonable. Want to send a patch? johannes
