On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 17:36 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:23:42AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: >> > On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 01:57 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 03:20:13AM -0700, Johannes Berg wrote: >> > > > +#define NL80211_BAND_ATTR_HT_CAPA NL80211_BAND_ATTR_HT_CAPA >> > > >> > > Typo >> > >> > Hmm? Am I too dense? >> >> Well, it looks a little useless to define something as itself... > > Yeah but you can use that to check "has the nl80211.h I'm compiling > against defined the HT stuff yet?" So you're going to #ifdef on the iw nl80211.h? Can't we use something better and more obvious like defining an nl80211 version (as kernel version won't do us any good for bleeding edge wireless-testing users) or something like that? Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
