On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 02:59:28PM +0200, Elias Oltmanns wrote: > > That was my first thought when I discovered this. However, from what I > > read on the web, I somehow got the impression that [um]delay() was > > alright as opposed to msleep(). What exactly is the difference then? > > Yes, only msleep() sleeps, mdelay spins. Opps, right. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
