Hi Rob,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 2:50 AM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The 'phandle-array' type is a bit ambiguous. It can be either just an
> array of phandles or an array of phandles plus args. Many schemas for
> phandle-array properties aren't clear in the schema which case applies
> though the description usually describes it.
>
> The array of phandles case boils down to needing:
>
> items:
> maxItems: 1
>
> The phandle plus args cases should typically take this form:
>
> items:
> - items:
> - description: A phandle
> - description: 1st arg cell
> - description: 2nd arg cell
>
> With this change, some examples need updating so that the bracketing of
> property values matches the schema.
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
The Renesas parts look good to me.
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
