On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 16:03 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 10:37:54PM +0300, Jouni Malinen wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 03:01:09PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > > > > Well I might be OK with that -- but are you (and Johannes) ready > > > to deal with the various "ap mode doesn't work with my hostapd > > > configuration" problems? > > > > I think that that is a better and more productive problem to handle > > assuming the issues are indeed because of something missing from > > cfg80211 configuration. I'm supposed to make sure that everything needed > > is there anyway and getting additional people testing various > > combinations and reporting potential problems sounds useful. > > I'm inclined to agree. I'd like it if Johannes agreed too. :-) I'd hate shipping it when there are still things to work out; how about we put it into -testing but not into -next? I just looked at the list and we still have * basic rate set * tx queue params left to do. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
