On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 09:38:49PM +0200, Stefanik Gábor wrote: > Another weird thing: the code above essentially attempts to do this: > Wait for an ACK > If not TX_CTL_NO_ACK: > If acked: > Report the packet as acked. > Endif > If no ACK until timeout: > Report packet as unacked > Endif > Endif > > This would be better, as it doesn't waste time waiting for an ACK for > unacked frames: > > If not TX_CTL_NO_ACK: > Wait for an ACK > If acked: > Report the packet as acked. > Endif > If no ACK until timeout: > Report packet as unacked > Endif > Endif > > Of course, this only works if "Wait for an ACK" actually works. Well as I understand it, the only waiting is related to the URB submission (which is asynchronous anyway). I don't really see how we could avoid it. John -- John W. Linville Linux should be at the core linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx of your literate lifestyle. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
