On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 04:31:17PM +0900, Sungbo Eo wrote:
> On 2021-12-18 07:02, Seth Forshee wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 01:12:08AM +0900, Sungbo Eo wrote:
> > > On 2021-10-28 03:06, Seth Forshee wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 08:38:21PM +0900, Sungbo Eo wrote:
> > > > > This patch is based on MSIT Public Notification 2020-113 ("Unlicensed Radio
> > > > > Equipment Established Without Notice"), officially announced on 2021-01-06.
> > > > >
> > > > > The PSD must not exceed 2.5 mW/MHz if the frequency range includes all or
> > > > > part of 5230-5250 MHz and the bandwidth is equal to or less than 40 MHz.
> > > > > This leads to the following:
> > > > > * 5230-5250 @ 20 -> 17 dBm
> > > > > * 5210-5250 @ 40 -> 20 dBm
> > > > > Here the power limits for 80/160 MHz bandwidth are also lowered to 17 dBm,
> > > > > as it's not possible to set different power limits for different bandwidths
> > > > > at the moment.
> > > > >
> > > > > Extend the last 5 GHz frequency range to 5850 MHz.
> > > > >
> > > > > WiFi 6E is now allowed with the following restrictions:
> > > > > * Indoor: the full 1.2 GHz range, up to 160 MHz bandwidth and 250mW EIRP
> > > > > * Outdoor: the lower 500 MHz range, up to 160 MHz bandwidth and 25mW EIRP
> > > > > Here only the former entry is added.
> > > > >
> > > > > And also update the regulatory source links.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Sungbo Eo <mans0n@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > v2:
> > > > > * split 5150-5250 MHz band rule to accommodate the PSD limit
> > > > > * remove AUTO-BW flag from 6 GHz band rule
> > > > > ---
> > > > > db.txt | 17 ++++++++++++-----
> > > > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt
> > > > > index 6e8dbef..387ac93 100644
> > > > > --- a/db.txt
> > > > > +++ b/db.txt
> > > > > @@ -862,15 +862,22 @@ country KP: DFS-JP
> > > > > (5490 - 5630 @ 20), (30), DFS
> > > > > (5735 - 5815 @ 20), (30)
> > > > > +# Source:
> > > > > +# https://www.law.go.kr/LSW//admRulLsInfoP.do?chrClsCd=&admRulSeq=2100000196972
> > > > > +# https://www.law.go.kr/LSW//admRulLsInfoP.do?chrClsCd=&admRulSeq=2100000196973
> > > > > +# https://www.law.go.kr/LSW//admRulLsInfoP.do?chrClsCd=&admRulSeq=2100000196974
> > > > > country KR: DFS-JP
> > > > > - # ref: https://www.rra.go.kr
> > > > > (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (23)
> > > > > - (5150 - 5250 @ 80), (23), AUTO-BW
> > > > > + (5150 - 5210 @ 40), (23), AUTO-BW
> > > > > + # max. PSD 2.5 mW/MHz in 5230-5250 MHz frequency range
> > > > > + (5210 - 5230 @ 20), (20), AUTO-BW
> > > > > + (5230 - 5250 @ 20), (17), AUTO-BW
> > > >
> > > > Even with 5210-5230 split out like this, 5210-5250 @ 40 still gets
> > > > limited to 17 dBm by the 5230-5250 rule. So why do we need to split out
> > > > 5210-5230 separate from 5150-5210?
> > >
> > > I did some tests with regdb and I found out that the rule to be applied
> > > depends on the main 20 MHz channel. With the rules above, if I select
> > > channel 48 (5230-5250) and enable VHT40, then the TX power is set to 17 dBm.
> > > OTOH if I select channel 44 (5210–5230) and enable VHT40, then the TX power
> > > is set to 20 dBm. I'm not sure whether my result is really correct, though.
> >
> > I'm sorry, when I saw the v3 patch I realized that I forgot to reply to
> > this email. I had wanted to take a look at the kernel source to try and
> > understand the behavior you described.
> >
> > I took a quick look, and from what I'm seeing the minimum of the power
> > limits for the two ranges should be used. This is the behavior I expect.
> > Can you provide more detail about how you're getting that result?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Seth
>
> I've got the result on MT7623+MT7615N AP with OpenWrt installed. (kernel
> 5.10)
> I set the channel and bandwidth in /etc/config/wireless (in OpenWrt-standard
> way) and checked the tx power with `iw dev wlan0 info` and Android WiFi
> Analyzer app.
>
> # channel 48, htmode VHT40
> type AP
> channel 48 (5240 MHz), width: 40 MHz, center1: 5230 MHz
> txpower 17.00 dBm
>
> # channel 44, htmode VHT40
> type AP
> channel 44 (5220 MHz), width: 40 MHz, center1: 5230 MHz
> txpower 20.00 dBm
>
> The WiFi Analyzer app also reported higher RSSI for the channel 44 case.
>
> I also had a quick look at net/wireless/reg.c and it seems you're right.
> Perhaps my tests were bad, I do believe your comments more than my result.
> ;)
That definitely seems odd. I'll try to have another look and see if I
can figure out why that's happening. I'd have suspected that what's
displayed by iw might just be a result of how the information is
reported or displayed, but the higher RSSI argues against that.
Thanks,
Seth
