On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 1:46 PM Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Many Intel based platforms face system random freeze after commit > > 9e2fd29864c5 ("rtw88: add napi support"). > > > > The commit itself shouldn't be the culprit. My guess is that the 8821CE > > only leaves ASPM L1 for a short period when IRQ is raised. Since IRQ is > > masked during NAPI polling, the PCIe link stays at L1 and makes RX DMA > > extremely slow. Eventually the RX ring becomes messed up: > > [ 1133.194697] rtw_8821ce 0000:02:00.0: pci bus timeout, check dma status > > > > Since the 8821CE hardware may fail to leave ASPM L1, manually do it in > > the driver to resolve the issue. > > > > Fixes: 9e2fd29864c5 ("rtw88: add napi support") > > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215131 > > BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927808 > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > [...] > > > static bool rtw_disable_msi; > > static bool rtw_pci_disable_aspm; > > +static int rtw_rx_aspm = -1; > > module_param_named(disable_msi, rtw_disable_msi, bool, 0644); > > module_param_named(disable_aspm, rtw_pci_disable_aspm, bool, 0644); > > +module_param_named(rx_aspm, rtw_rx_aspm, int, 0444); > > MODULE_PARM_DESC(disable_msi, "Set Y to disable MSI interrupt support"); > > MODULE_PARM_DESC(disable_aspm, "Set Y to disable PCI ASPM support"); > > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(rx_aspm, "Use PCIe ASPM for RX (0=disable, 1=enable, -1=default)") > > We already have disable_aspm parameter, why do we need yet another one? > There's a high bar for new module parameters. It's a good way for (un)affected users to try out different settings. But yes the parameter isn't necessary. Let me send another version without it. Kai-Heng > > -- > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ > > https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches