Otherwise, we get values like "133/100" for quality output from iwconfig. :-( Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- This is currently untested, but it seems reasonable to me...any takers? :-) drivers/net/wireless/rtl8180_dev.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rtl8180_dev.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rtl8180_dev.c index b7172a1..e9edcaa 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rtl8180_dev.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rtl8180_dev.c @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ static void rtl8180_handle_rx(struct ieee80211_hw *dev) rx_status.antenna = (flags2 >> 15) & 1; /* TODO: improve signal/rssi reporting */ - rx_status.qual = flags2 & 0xFF; + rx_status.qual = ((flags2 & 0xFF) * 100) / 256; rx_status.signal = (flags2 >> 8) & 0x7F; /* XXX: is this correct? */ rx_status.rate_idx = (flags >> 20) & 0xF; -- 1.5.4.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
