Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > First patch is to avoid writing "partition size" on read-only firmware > buffer, so it has to fix the crash. > The later two patches are used to make the semantics clear, but they don't > change the logic at all. > > I hope at least first patch can be taken into 5.16-rc, so people can avoid > this crash. > > v2: Add Buglink and Tested-by tags. > > Ping-Ke Shih (3): > rtw89: update partition size of firmware header on skb->data > rtw89: add const in the cast of le32_get_bits() > rtw89: use inline function instead macro to set H2C and CAM > > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/cam.h | 468 ++++-- > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c | 2 +- > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.h | 1768 ++++++++++++--------- > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/txrx.h | 46 +- > 4 files changed, 1370 insertions(+), 914 deletions(-) Patch 1 should definitely go to wireless-drivers to fix the crash. But I'm not sure about patches 2-3, they are quite large, and more like cleanup than fixes, so wireless-drivers-next sounds more approriate to me. But I can't decide, any thoughts on this? -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
