Linus Lüssing <linus.luessing@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 09:25:12PM +0200, Linus Lüssing wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The following are two patches for ath9k to fix a potential interrupt >> storm (PATCH 2/3) and to fix potentially resetting the wifi chip while >> its interrupts were accidentally reenabled (PATCH 3/3). >> >> PATCH 1/3 adds the possibility to trigger the ath9k queue reset through >> the ath9k reset file in debugfs. Which was helpful to reproduce and debug >> this issue and might help for future debugging. >> >> PATCH 2/3 and PATCH 3/3 should be applicable for stable. >> >> Regards, Linus >> > > I've marked PATCH 3/3 as "rejected" in Patchwork now due to > Felix's legitimate remarks. BTW I prefer to mark patches as rejected myself in patchwork so that I know what's happening (patchwork is lacking in this respect as it doesn't notify me if there are any changes in patches). But good that you mentioned this via email so I didn't need to wonder what happened. > For patches 1/3 and and 2/3 I'd still like to see them merged upstream > if there is no objection to those. Thanks, I was about to ask what I should do with this patchset. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
