On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 11:07:09PM +0200, Jonas Dreßler wrote: > On 9/30/21 10:58 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 08:04:00PM +0200, Jonas Dreßler wrote: ... > > Second, what is the problem with having one write more or less? > > Your current code doesn't guarantee this either. It only decreases > > probability of such scenario. Am I wrong? > > Indeed my approach just decreases the probability and we sometimes end up > writing twice to wakeup the card, but it would kinda bug me if we'd always > do one write too much. > > Anyway, if you still prefer the read_poll_timeout() solution I'd be alright > with that of course. Yes, it will make code cleaner. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
