Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Jouni Malinen <jouni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> From: Seevalamuthu Mariappan <seevalam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> If monitor interface is enabled in co-exist mode, only local traffic are
>> captured. It's caused by missing monitor vdev in co-exist mode. So,
>> monitor mode clean up is done with separate Monitor APIs. For this,
>> introduce monitor_started and monitor_vdev_created boolean flags.
>>
>> Tested-on: IPQ8074 hw2.0 AHB WLAN.HK.2.4.0.1-01725-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
>
> Seevalamuthu, in upstream IPQ8074 doesn't even support monitor mode:
>
> static const struct ath11k_hw_params ath11k_hw_params[] = {
> {
> .hw_rev = ATH11K_HW_IPQ8074,
> .name = "ipq8074 hw2.0",
> ...
> .interface_modes = BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION) |
> BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_AP) |
> BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_MESH_POINT),
>
> So I wonder how did you test this? Is this something which is only
> tested on ancient QSDK kernels and not with upstream kernels?
Actually, ignore that. I forgot that there was a separate boolean for
the monitor mode:
.supports_monitor = true,
Sorry for the noise.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
